Skip to content
Golden Power & Italian AI Law Clearance | BCAUN.IT

Italian FDI screening & AI clearance

Italy can stop your deal. Find out in five days.

Golden Power screening freezes transactions in sectors most investors never think of as strategic — and artificial intelligence is now one of them. We tell you whether your deal is caught, before you sign.

835Golden Power filings
in Italy, 2024
+44.7%growth over 2023,
when there were 577
45business days of standstill
once a filing is required
3%of turnover, and a void deal,
if you should have filed

The problem

Two Italian regimes. Most investors meet the second one first.

Italy screens who may acquire or build in its strategic sectors, and separately governs what those companies may do with AI once they operate. Both bodies of rules are new. Both carry penalties measured against turnover.

Large firms handle the first inside M&A mandates at M&A prices. Cyber and privacy consultancies handle the second and never touch investment screening. Nobody answers both questions in one document, before signing — which is the only moment either answer is useful.

Gate one · Golden Power

May you buy or build this at all?

State screening under Decree-Law 21/2012, as amended through Law 4/2026. Sectors run far past defence: energy, transport, communications, health, agri-food, finance, semiconductors, critical raw materials — and critical technologies, expressly including artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, robotics, biotech and aerospace.

Triggers
Share acquisitions, control, voting rights, greenfield operations and intra-group reorganisations
Standstill
The deal cannot complete; voting rights are frozen until clearance
Clock
45 business days · 30 for 5G · extensions of 10–20 days · silence means consent
Exposure
Up to 3% of turnover, agreements in breach are null and void, and the government may order reinstatement at your cost
Gate two · Law 132/2025

What may the company then do?

The first national AI law in the European Union, in force since 10 October 2025, layered on top of the AI Act. It governs AI in the workplace, healthcare, research and the professions, and created a criminal offence for disseminating AI-generated or altered content.

Workplace
Employees must be informed; system logic, data parameters, accuracy metrics and human oversight must be disclosed
Employment
Draft decree: no decision on automated processing alone, and dismissals in breach are void
Oversight
AgID notifies · ACN runs market surveillance · sectoral regulators keep their remit
Exposure
Draft decree: up to €35m or 7% of worldwide turnover for prohibited practices

A non-EU investor taking 10% of an Italian AI company walks through both gates in one transaction.

Gate one, because AI is a critical technology and the deal freezes until Rome clears it. Gate two, because Italian AI obligations attach from the day the business operates. The same facts drive both analyses — so they belong in one document, produced once, before signing.

What triggers a filing

The thresholds nobody reads until it is too late.

Two lines below account for most of the surprises. Greenfield operations are caught — opening an Italian business from scratch can require clearance. So are internal reorganisations: 12% of all 2024 filings came from groups that were not buying anything.

Sector groupWho must notifyThresholdAlso caught
Defence & national security Every investor, including Italian and EU 3 · 5 · 10 · 15 · 20 · 25 · 50 % OwnershipControlVoting rights
Energy · transport · communications · health · agri-food · finance Any EU or Italian investor controlling interest Extraordinary transactions
The same, where the investor is non-EU Non-EU investor ≥ 10% · value ≥ €1m GreenfieldIntra-group
Critical technologies — AI, cybersecurity, semiconductors, robotics, biotech, aerospace Non-EU investor ≥ 10% (≥ €1m) or control GreenfieldIntra-group
Critical raw materials — export The exporting entity notify ≥ 10 days ahead 30% of value, min €30,000
Share pledges over strategic assets no automatic filing Council of State, 5 Dec 2025

Thresholds summarised from published practitioner reviews of the regime for 2026. Every figure is verified against the consolidated text of Decree-Law 21/2012 and its implementing decrees before it appears in any client deliverable. This table is general information and is not a substitute for an assessment on your facts.

Free · two minutes · no contact details

Four questions. An indicative answer.

Before you engage anyone, find out whether Italian screening is likely to apply to your transaction — with the rule that drives the answer shown, not hidden.

01What does the target actually do?
02Where is the ultimate investor controlled?
03What stake, at what value?
04Acquisition, greenfield, or intra-group?

Services

Diagnose first. Execute only if the diagnosis says so.

Roughly three to five screenings are performed for every notification that actually results, because most conclude no filing is required. That answer is worth paying for on its own — it is the one your board and your lenders will ask to see in writing.

Clearance Screening · S1

Five business days, from facts to a signed conclusion.

Day 1

Facts

What the target builds and sells, the full ownership chain to ultimate beneficial owners, and the deal structure.

Day 2

Classification

The target tested against the strategic-asset lists, including the critical-technology limb where AI sits.

Day 3

Investor

EU or non-EU status determined at every relevant level of the chain, not just at the top.

Day 4

Triggers

Thresholds applied, with greenfield, intra-group, pledges, options and staged acquisitions tested expressly.

Day 5

Conclusion

Route recommended, standstill modelled against your calendar, residual risk stated, signed by Italian counsel.

Who we work with

Mid-market deals, where a dedicated FDI team is not an option.

We are deliberately not built for the billion-euro auction — the magic-circle firms own that work and should keep it. We are built for the transaction where screening is discovered three weeks before signing.

Acquirers

Non-EU buyers of Italian technology

US, UK, Indian and Hong Kong groups acquiring Italian AI, cyber, biotech, agri-food or semiconductor businesses, typically between €2m and €50m.

Advisers

Corporate finance and foreign counsel

M&A boutiques running Italian processes, and law firms outside Italy who need a correspondent on FDI screening rather than a competitor on the mandate.

Groups

Companies reorganising themselves

Foreign-owned groups moving an Italian entity, business unit or asset internally — the category that produced one filing in eight last year, almost always unexpectedly.

Who does the work

Two people. Both of them on your file.

No account managers and no intake process. The first conversation is with the person who will reach the conclusion and put their reasoning in writing. Notification filings are conducted with Italian co-counsel who file regularly.

Alexander Baranov Founder & Principal

Eighteen years, since 2008, in cross-border corporate structures across the EU, the Gulf and Asia. Over 1,300 projects. Owns the ownership-chain analysis and the conclusion.

Matteo Fonte Legal Counsel · Italy

Italian qualified lawyer. Signs the legal position, handles Italian counterparties, notaries and the Camera di Commercio, and reads what Italy will and will not accept.

Request a screening

Send the facts. Get an answer in five days.

Tell us what the target does, where the ultimate investor is controlled, and what you are acquiring or building. We will confirm scope and fee within one business day, and say plainly if you do not need us.

TurnaroundScope and fee confirmed within one business day
ConflictsChecked before any facts are discussed in detail